Given the tightening of furnished rental taxation and the gradual phasing out of certain advantageous schemes, many owners are turning to a Civil Real Estate Company subject to corporate income tax (IS).
This ownership structure, often presented as a secure alternative, offers several advantages: tax stability, management flexibility, and real estate yield optimization.
However, behind its apparent strengths, the Corporate Tax SCI hides tax pitfalls that are sometimes overlooked, notably the rental income contribution (CRL).
Creating a Corporate Tax SCI allows for a more predictable tax regime than that of the furnished rental regime (LMNP or LMP).
The main advantages are:
Thus, the Corporate Tax SCI may seem more profitable in the short and medium term, especially for investors who wish to reinvest their rental income in new projects.
However, this tax regime has several perverse long-term effects.
In case of resale of the property, the real estate capital gain is calculated according to rules specific to corporate tax:
Result: the taxation upon sale is often significantly heavier than anticipated.
However, the most overlooked risk remains the CRL (rental income contribution), an additional tax that many taxpayers discover too late.
The rental income contribution (CRL) is due by:
In other words, it is sufficient for a single partner of an SCI to be subject to corporate tax for all rental income received to become subject to the CRL.
This condition is assessed at the close of the financial year.
Certain SCIs are exempt from this contribution:
Thus, for 2025, the CRL only applies to buildings completed before January 1, 2010.
The CRL rate is set at 2.5% of gross rents collected.
This percentage, although seemingly modest, directly impacts the profitability of the scheme, especially when rents are high.
Let’s consider the case of a Corporate Tax SCI receiving €60,000 in annual rent for an old building.
The CRL amounts to €1,500 per year, or €7,500 over 5 years, with no possibility of deduction.
This additional charge is added to corporate income tax (IS) and dividend taxation in case of distribution.
The choice to subject an SCI to corporate tax must be carefully considered.
It may be relevant for:
Conversely, for owners wishing to resell in the medium term, the Income Tax SCI often remains more advantageous.
A personalized comparative study is therefore essential to assess:
Not always. In the short term, it allows for reduced taxation of rents through depreciation. But in the long term, capital gains taxation can be much higher.
By opting for an SCI not subject to corporate tax, or by renting a building completed less than 15 years ago. SCIs subject to VAT are also exempt.
The rate is 2.5% of gross rents collected each year.
No. The transition to corporate tax is
Because it helps you model the tax impacts of the scheme and secure the legal structure of your real estate investment.
VV Avocat Law Firm assists you with all your tax procedures, in both French and English.
For personalized support, please see our Fees page
The involvement of a tax lawyer allows for:
ensuring the legal compliance of your declarations;
detecting errors in proposed adjustments;
engaging with the administration on equal terms;
and, if necessary, bringing the dispute before the administrative court.
Attorney Vincent Vialard, tax lawyer in Toulouse, has recognized expertise in corporate tax law, in real estate and wealth taxation, as well as in tax litigation.
The firm operates throughout France, particularly in Paris and the Occitanie region.